Thursday, May 25, 2006
I had the opportunity to do some work for Paul for the Center for Cooperative Research Website
timeline. It was very interesting, although some of the information was quite labor intensive, and back tracking some of these archives took a couple days.
I am grateful for the experience, although an array of serious health issues prohibited my continued work on the project.
I have to say in all honesty, that until one looks at all the facts presented to opine that a conspiracy theory is taking place would, with out question be a act of blatant ignorance.
Perhaps some american's do not want to grasp the unthinkable, but if you go back to Operation Northwoods and the Government plan to cast an attack on American cities and blame it on Castro, and Franklin D. Roosevelts prior knowledge of the bombing of Pearl Harbor as a segue into war with Germany, the unthinkable becomes an startling reality.
Sunday, May 14, 2006
CLOSE-UP: PENTAGON PHOTOGRAPH
BEFORE THE STRUCTURAL COLLAPSE OCCURRED
Why were America and the world never shown the video and photographs of the Pentagon, BEFORE the outer wall had collapsed showing only one 16 ft. hole. Many people do not realize that the outer wall did not collapse until almost 30 minutes after the initial impact. These photographs and video footage speak for themselves.
Given that the outer wall of the Pentagon had not yet collapsed and the only hole is approximately 16 ft. in diameter - how does a plane over 44 feet tall and 125 ft. wide fit into that hole as shown in the crystal-clear and close-up photographic evidence from the Pentagon? Furthermore, can physics explain why there is no damage to the Pentagon's upper floors where the tail section would have hit? Close-ups of this section are extremely revealing.
“I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast – it sounded nothing like an airplane.”
Lon Rains - editor for Space News (Pentagon eyewitness)
In the aftermath, it was reported by media sources that a giant 100 ft. crater was plowed into the front lawn of the Pentagon as the result of a powerful airliner crash? Why does photographic evidence overwhelmingly show that this was absolutely not the case? Why no crater? Why no skid marks? Why no burn marks? Why was the entire world deliberately mislead? Examine the video and photographic evidence for yourself.
How does a Boeing 757, constructed from lightweight aluminum, penetrate over 9 ft. of steel reinforced concrete? Photographs and recently discovered computer animations help shed light on this unexplained feat of physics.
Contrary to the pictures shown to the American public, after the fact, why does photographic evidence taken only a few moments after the Pentagon event show no wreckage on the lawn of the Pentagon? Where is the plane? Where is the tail, the wings, the luggage, the seats, the landing gear; the engines? What happened to the passengers?
At the World Trade Center, why did firefighters, reporters and other on the scene eyewitnesses describe a demolition-like, pancake collapse of buildings One, Two & Seven? Hear the outrageous admissions made by the building lease owner recorded on video, plus shocking new video evidence helps to answer some of these important questions.
What is the bright flash on the right side of the Boeing 767, seen just before impact on both the North Tower & the South Tower, captured on video by 5 separate cameramen including CNN and ABC? Slow motion analysis reveals startling verification of this extraordinary event and begs the question, "What is it?" Find out what former military personnel think this could be.
Why were there numerous reports of bombs & explosions going off in and around the WTC before any buildings had collapsed? Hear & see the testimony of the reporters, rescue teams and eyewitnesses who tell a different story of potential demolition charges, unexplained explosions, and vehicles loaded with explosives as reported on live television the morning of Sept. 11, 2001.
Why did a FOX News employee, who witnessed the second tower attack, report seeing no windows on “Flight 175” a commercial United Airlines jetliner? Why did another eyewitness report that United Airlines Flight 175 was not a commercial airliner? What kind of plane hit the second tower?
Is there some type of exterior swelling protruding from the undercarriage of “Flight 175” ? An independently conducted computerized digital analysis says yes. Where was this "instrument" attached? How could it have departed from a commercial airport without being noticed? What purpose did it serve in the attacks? Full-screen television blow-ups directly from CNN and other mainstream sources reveal the intricate details of this strange anomaly.
What people are saying about 911 In Plane Site:
"Mesmerizing... Absolutely Brilliant"
Joan Veon - Women's International Media Group
"Shocking - Thought provoking - Raises serious questions about the government's honesty in conducting the 9-11 investigation"
Tom Flocco - TomFlocco.com
"Everyone in America should see this video."
Dick Gregory - DickGregory.com
"Absolutely awesome. This is the one September 11 video that everyone should see."
Lou Epton - The Lou Epton Show
"When we set out to make 911 In Plane Site, we simply wanted to make a quality film that presented new evidence. We had no idea that it would become an overnight hit with so many people around the world and were certainly unaware that so many people would call it the #1 film exposing September 11th."
"There's something to be said for simplicity. Just show people the evidence and let them make up their own minds. Besides, it's hard to argue with video evidence. It speaks for itself."
"Soon after the Director's Cut was released, clips from the film started showing up on CNN and FOX News. That's when a lot of politicians and the military community started to pay careful attention to the evidence that was being presented."
More Photos Click Here
| || |